What 'Centralised' Actually Means for Multi-Academy Trusts

The term "centralisation" gets thrown around often in education circles, especially when discussing how Multi-Academy Trusts (MATs) can scale effectively. But what does it really mean to centralise, and how can trusts do it without becoming overbearing or bureaucratic?

This post breaks down what true centralisation looks like for MATs and highlights the key differences between meaningful centralisation and surface-level coordination.

Understanding True Centralisation

Centralisation isn't just about control, it's about clarity. In a well-centralised MAT, every school retains its identity and autonomy on the ground, but key operational and compliance processes are streamlined and consistent across the trust.

Here's what that can look like in practice:

1. Shared Policies That Actually Stick

• Core policies (like safeguarding, whistleblowing, health and safety) are authored centrally and distributed automatically
• Schools adopt and implement these policies directly, without needing to adapt or reformat them
• Version control ensures that updates are instant and auditable across all academies

2. Unified Dashboards for Visibility

• Central leaders can access real-time compliance data from all schools
• Trends, risks, and outstanding actions are visible at trust level
• Local staff can still view their own data, but trust leaders get the strategic overview

3. Standardised Training Records and CPD

• Staff across all schools receive the same mandatory training packages
• Completion is tracked in one place, with automatic reminders and expiry alerts
• Local flexibility is preserved for role-specific or site-specific training

4. Consistent Reporting Without the Chase

• Incident reporting, low-level concerns, and safeguarding records feed into a central system
• This removes the need for termly email chases, spreadsheets, or manual uploads
• The central team gets accurate data without interrupting day-to-day operations

Pseudo-Centralisation: The Common Pitfalls

Many MATs believe they're centralised when, in reality, they're relying on fragmented systems that depend on goodwill and manual effort. Here are common signs of pseudo-centralisation:

• Policies stored in shared drives that are inconsistently adopted
• Training records kept on spreadsheets or multiple LMS platforms
• Dashboards built in Google Sheets or emailed in PDFs
• Processes that vary significantly between schools due to unclear expectations

These systems might feel collaborative, but they're fragile and heavily dependent on key individuals.

Giving Leaders Leverage Without Micromanaging

True centralisation empowers trust leaders to guide, not grind. Instead of chasing up spreadsheets or reconciling inconsistent reports, they can:

• Spot issues early through standardised reporting
• Make data-informed decisions across the trust
• Support schools proactively based on risk or need

This is where systems like CalmCompliance come in. By providing shared structures, automated processes, and unified oversight, trusts can operate like a single organisation without stifling the unique culture of each school.

Takeaway

Centralisation isn't about tightening the reins, it's about giving everyone the same map so they can take the best path forward. For MATs aiming to grow sustainably, true centralisation isn't optional, it's essential.

---